Assurance Should Change Decisions, Not Add Another Layer of Process
How leaders can use assurance, business cases and decision gates to improve continuation, investment and termination choices rather than create ceremony.
Professional knowledge and strategic perspectives across strategy, projects, operations, engineering, transformation and business performance.
13 articles found
How leaders can use assurance, business cases and decision gates to improve continuation, investment and termination choices rather than create ceremony.
Every firm improving its risk practice by adopting the same method raises the sector's average standard and correlates its errors. Assurance is where the correlation lands first.
Nothing in the risk discipline retires a control, so the estate compounds unowned, and the assurance function that reviews it can only ever find there is too little.
The padlock proves encryption, not legitimacy. Consumer-grade cyber advice given to executives stands in for a risk-appetite decision the board never made.
A widely taught fairness audit returns a clean result precisely when bias is most deeply encoded. What an assurance test must do to detect proxy encoding.
How deeply you can see into work you have commissioned is a decision almost nobody makes deliberately — and depth is worthless without someone able to read it.
An enterprise that aggregates risk across delivery units is adding numbers produced by incompatible scales, and the portfolio figure that results is not a quantity.
Planning rests on a guarantee that the decomposition holds all the work, yet the only completeness check on offer examines the plan against itself and cannot detect absence.
Scope, schedule, cost and risk baselines each pass their own assurance and still disagree about the finish date, because nothing is authorised to compare them.
A register that feeds appraisal stops reporting exposure and starts reporting reputations. Decide which instrument you own, because the appraisal cycle decides by default.
A green quality report proves you built what you described. It cannot tell you the description was worth building — and no assurance procedure ever will.
Executives do not need to build the model. They need enough depth to tell when the recovery plan in front of them is arithmetically impossible.
Adoption by reference freezes a technical standard at one edition while the standard keeps revising, so diligent upgrading can quietly move an enterprise outside its own obligation.