Risk and Resilience
You Cannot Fix the Price of an Undefined Outcome
How specification maturity, acceptance criteria and technology uncertainty determine whether cost risk can be transferred credibly through fixed pricing.
EraNorth Insights
Decision-grade thinking for complex work.
Professional knowledge and strategic perspectives across strategy, projects, operations, engineering, transformation and business performance.
15 articles found
Risk and Resilience
When Contract Freedom Meets Public Policy: Restraint of Trade, Confidentiality and the Limits of Commercial Control
How leaders should think about restraint clauses, confidential information and trade secrets without assuming a contract can control every future behaviour.
Risk and Resilience
The Party You Cannot Sue
The party that causes your worst loss is rarely one you can sue, and recovery runs in series down a chain, so the probability of getting paid multiplies away.
Risk and Resilience
The Liability Cap Nobody Adds Up
Every liability cap is a decision to absorb a supplier's failure above a line, taken by people not accountable for the loss, and nobody holds the total.
Risk and Resilience
Risk Allocation Is Not Risk Elimination: What Procurement Models Really Change
Why procurement models can transfer, retain or share defined risks but cannot eliminate uncertainty, weak scope or poor interface governance from a project.
Risk and Resilience
Repudiation Before the Due Date: Accept, Affirm or Wait?
When a counterparty announces it will not perform, leaders must choose whether to accept repudiation, affirm the contract or preserve another strategic option.
Risk and Resilience
Performance Security Is Not Free Protection
How leaders should choose between bonds, retention and guarantees by balancing continuity protection, supplier economics, enforceability and project risk.
Risk and Resilience
Mistake Is Not a Get-Out Clause: When Shared Error Undermines the Deal
How common and mutual mistake affect transaction integrity, and why leaders should separate fundamental assumptions from ordinary commercial misjudgement.
Risk and Resilience
Liquidated Damages Should Price Consequence, Not Punish Delay
Why liquidated damages should create commercial certainty around late completion rather than operate as an arbitrary threat or substitute for weak schedule governance.
Risk and Resilience
'Insurance Is Risk Architecture: Match Cover to Responsibility, Not Habit'
Why contract insurance should follow the actual loss pathways, responsibilities and project interfaces rather than being copied mechanically from precedent.
Risk and Resilience
How Legal Authority Actually Works: Statute, Common Law, Equity and Precedent
A practical executive guide to understanding legal authority, precedent and why not every legal opinion carries the same decision weight.
Risk and Resilience
Foreseeable Risk Should Be Contracted, Not Hoped Away: The Limits of Frustration
Why leaders should allocate foreseeable disruption, approval risk and contingency in contracts rather than rely on frustration after the event.
Risk and Resilience
Force Majeure and Frustration Are Not the Same Risk
Why exceptional-event clauses and the legal doctrine of frustration solve different problems, and how leaders should decide which uncertainty belongs in the contract.
Portfolio Leadership
You Contracted With a Company, Not a Capability
A contract binds a legal person, not the capability it holds, so a critical supplier can pass to an owner you would have rejected without any decision you were part of.
Leadership and Decision-Making
A Signed Contract Can Still Fail: The Executive Map of Defective Consent
A strategic guide to defective consent, showing why duress, undue influence, mistake, misrepresentation and unconscionability can destabilise agreements.
Loading more Insights…