The Counterfactual Is Part of the Investment Case
Why credible investment decisions require an explicit baseline, system boundary and displaced alternative rather than evaluating projects in isolation.
Professional knowledge and strategic perspectives across strategy, projects, operations, engineering, transformation and business performance.
6 articles found
Why credible investment decisions require an explicit baseline, system boundary and displaced alternative rather than evaluating projects in isolation.
How leaders can avoid burden shifting by evaluating carbon, durability, toxicity, energy, emissions, performance and cost as an integrated engineering decision.
A decision framework for evaluating waste-derived materials across function, carbon, manufacturability, compliance, durability, scalability and economics.
Why outperforming peers does not prove sustainability, and how environmental budgets can change targets, portfolio choices and accountability.
Why environmental decisions should test uncertainty, ranking stability and downside exposure before precise sustainability scores drive capital choices.
Why technologies that look sustainable in isolation can change ranking when energy systems, operating profiles, logistics, scale and location are included.