Risk and Resilience
Why One Machine Failure Costs More Than a Thousand Human Ones
Automated decisions are judged as policy because they trace back to a specification someone approved. That asymmetry belongs in your deployment threshold.
EraNorth Insights
Decision-grade thinking for complex work.
Professional knowledge and strategic perspectives across strategy, projects, operations, engineering, transformation and business performance.
11 articles found
Risk and Resilience
Two Funds, Two Authorities
Contingency and management reserve admit different events under different authorities. One undifferentiated pot merges a delivery decision with a governance one.
Risk and Resilience
The Padlock Is Not the Control
The padlock proves encryption, not legitimacy. Consumer-grade cyber advice given to executives stands in for a risk-appetite decision the board never made.
Risk and Resilience
The Liability Cap Nobody Adds Up
Every liability cap is a decision to absorb a supplier's failure above a line, taken by people not accountable for the loss, and nobody holds the total.
Risk and Resilience
Risk Appetite, Tolerance and Capacity Are Not the Same Thing
How leaders can distinguish willingness to take risk, operating boundaries and true capacity for loss when making enterprise and portfolio decisions.
Risk and Resilience
Risk Appetite Is a Strategic Boundary, Not a Compliance Statement
How boards and executives can use risk appetite to shape strategy, portfolio choices, tolerances and resource allocation before commitments are made.
Risk and Resilience
An Expected Value in a Ranking's Clothes
Multiplying probability by impact is an expected-value calculation used as a ranking rule. It is correct only for an enterprise indifferent to variance.
Risk and Resilience
A Zero-Tolerance Commitment Is a Capital Decision
An absolute constraint abolishes acceptance and most of transfer, leaving only the two costliest risk responses — and that price never returns to the business case.
Program Governance
Escalation Sized by One Risk
Escalation thresholds fire on the size of a single risk and are widened by an offsetting claim the same doctrine denies, so accumulation never reaches the board.
Portfolio Leadership
Risk-Informed Portfolio Selection: Why the Highest Return Is Not Always the Best Choice
How portfolio leaders can balance expected value, downside exposure, correlated risk, capacity and strategic resilience when selecting investments.
Leadership and Decision-Making
Treated, or Tolerated?
A risk can leave the escalation report because it was treated or because the tolerance moved beneath it, and no instrument in common use tells a board which happened.
Loading more Insights…